NEWSLETTER-2019-metin

265 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW “ Signs that are identical to, or indistinguishably similar to a trade- mark” means that the two signs compared are identical, indifferent, or they are each other’s identical, indifferent copies. If the signs have even minor differences, they will not be accepted as being identical. The Office defined the trademarks, below, as identical, or indis- tinguishably similar, within the scope of Article 5/1-ç of the IPC: ANJELIKA ANGELIKA INFINTY INFINITI MULTITECH MULTITEK K-LITE KLITE DERT DERTT STOCKER’S STOCKER The Office stated that the trademarks, below, are not identical, nor indistinguishably similar, within the scope of Article 5/1-ç of the IPC: CAN CANIM MOM MOMS KASABA BYKASABA THE BAHÇE BAHÇE MYWORLD WORLD GULER 1970 GULER CNDN CANDAN CASHMERE KAŞMİR Article 5/3 of the IPC regulates that if a notarial document in- dicating the clear consent of the prior trademark proprietor for the registration of the application is submitted to the Office, then the trademark application will not be refused based on Article 5/1-ç of the